We will present the open source AI tool Harmony at the second Building AI for Good - Showcase & Meetup on 23 January 2025 organised by Newspeak House.
* 18:30 - Doors Open
19:00 - 19:20: Thomas Wood (Fast Data Science) and Bettina Moltrecht on supporting psychologists with Harmony. We will discuss using generative AI and LLMs to help researchers discover datasets and compare items in mental health questionnaires, even when they are written in different languages. Harmony is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and previously by the Wellcome Trust.
19:25 - 19:45: Rob on voice AI user interfaces
19:50 - 20:10: Lorraine on building AI for Practice
20:15 onwards: community notices and mingling
Dr Bettina Moltrecht is a mental health researcher based at the University College London (UCL) and the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families in the UK. Bettina combines a strong clinical, tech and research background in her work.
Thomas Wood studied physics at university, and then did a masters in natural language processing in 2008. In 2018, he founded Fast Data Science, so he could work as a freelance consultant in natural language processing and machine learning. He is working as the industry partner on the Harmony project, and his other work includes applying natural language processing to clinical trial protocols.
Help us design the next phase of Harmony and win up to £300 in vouchers! Search and Results UX/UI Challenge Harmony is a platform for researchers to help them discover and compare complex meta-data across different academic studies. The project is a collaboration between University College London (UCL), The University of Ulster, and Fast Data Science and has been funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and by Wellcome as part of the Wellcome Data Prize in Mental Health.
It’s all over! The Matching Challenge is now officially closed. Thank you to everyone who took part. The wait is over! We have now closed the Matching Challenge which was hosted on DOXA AI. Over the course of the competition we saw a total of 26 participants with 14 finalists making it onto the scoreboard. The final days were tense with many participants improving on their scores, submitting different methods and swapping places at the top of the scoreboard.
