GHQ 12 vs CRISIS Comparing commonly used mental health assessment tools can be a daunting and laborious task. Particularly, when it involves questionnaires like the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ 12) and the Coronavirus Health Impact Survey (CRISIS). Both of these questionnaires serve valuable purposes in psychology research, GHQ 12 is widely used for detecting psychological distress, while CRISIS accounts for the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, harmonising questions between these two can be challenging due to the differences in the context they were developed for. Using Harmony, a state-of-the-art tool developed for psychologists and social scientists, comparison and harmonisation of GHQ 12 vs CRISIS could be achieved with greater ease and efficiency. Harmony employs large language models to compare these instruments and provide a percentage match between each item, making the process of data comparison across studies simpler, faster, and more comprehensive. This tool takes away the strain of manual comparison and offers an advanced solution that allows for a smooth transition between different questionnaire items. The GHQ 12 vs CRISIS task serves as an excellent example of harmonisation needs in psychology and demonstrates how Harmony can be an essential tool for researchers in the field. With its ability to handle multiple languages and user-friendly interface that allows you to drag and drop your own instruments, Harmony presents a tailored solution for the complex issue of data harmonisation. By using Harmony for GHQ 12 vs CRISIS, researchers can accurately and easily compare and contrast these important instruments, contributing to more nuanced and robust psychology research.
