When it comes to comparing questionnaires in different areas of psychology research, especially those related to substance use and mental health, such as the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Drugs (ESPAD) and the History & Aetiology Schedule (HAS), challenges abound. Diverse topics, phrasing, and language use all contribute to the complexity of conducting a thorough and insightful comparison. This is where Harmony comes in. Harnessing the power of natural language processing and generative AI models, Harmony can simplifying the process of ESPAD vs HAS comparison. The ESPAD questionnaire contains explicit questions regarding cigarette use, while the HAS encompasses broader aspects such as living conditions, medical history, life events, and alcohol consumption. Stacking ESPAD vs HAS manually for harmonisation might seem like a daunting task considering the broad and diverse scope of questions involved. However, with Harmony, these questionnaires can be compared efficiently. Harmony gives a percentage match between each item in ESPAD and HAS, providing a clear scale of similarity and discrepancy. By leveraging Harmony in ESPAD vs HAS comparisons, researchers are not only freed from the time-consuming process of manual harmonisation but also benefit from AI’s objectivity in questionnaire matching. Ensure to make full use of Harmony’s capabilities by either selecting from its existing database or importing your own instruments in PDF format into Harmony’s web interface. So whether it is ESPAD vs HAS or any other possible questionnaire pairing, Harmony stands ready to facilitate seamless harmonisation in psychology research.
