Harmony an innovative tool using natural language processing and AI, offers a compelling solution for psychologists wanting to compare the CES-D and TFEQ instruments. By harmonising these questionnaires, researchers can make consistent comparisons within and across various longitudinal studies. Undertaking this comparison manually can be time-consuming and subjective but Harmony overcomes these challenges by providing a percentage match between each item in the CES-D and TFEQ. To make the process even simpler, Harmony’s intuitive web interface allows you to select instruments from a comprehensive database or upload your own in a PDF form. Both the CES-D instrument (measuring symptoms associated with depression) and the TFEQ (examining attitudes towards eating) consist of multiple items. Comparing these two questionnaires, CES-D vs TFEQ, could provide invaluable insights for psychologists. The CES-D questionnaire focuses on feelings such as restlessness and loneliness, while the TFEQ asks about the respondents’ relationship to food, particularly in relation to feelings and hunger cues. Harmony’s robust generative AI models facilitate the harmonisation of these items, even if they’re in different languages. So why should psychologists choose Harmony for their CES-D vs TFEQ comparison? Not only does Harmony make harmonisation quicker and more objective, but it also allows for comparisons across different languages. CES-D vs TFEQ comparison can highlight unique correlations between depressive symptoms and eating behaviours, providing a base for future research and interventions. With Harmony, psychologists can focus on interpreting the data, not on the tiresome task of data harmonisation. Make the most out of your cohort and longitudinal studies by using Harmony for comparison.
