As a psychologist or social scientist, if you’ve ever needed to compare questionnaires such as the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) and the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire (AEBQ), you know that this task can be a large effort. Harmonising questionnaires is a time-consuming and subjective task that often involves manual comparison of long documents. That’s where Harmony comes in – an innovative tool designed to simplify and standardize the process. CES-D vs AEBQ harmonisation is now an easy task thanks to Harmony’s advanced algorithms and user-friendly interface. Harmony uses natural language processing and generative AI models to help researchers harmonise questionnaire items. It doesn’t just work on items in the same language, but also across different languages. Want to compare CES-D vs AEBQ? No problem. Harmony uses large language models to compare these instruments and provide a percentage match between each item in CES-D and AEBQ. This helps researchers save time and provide more accurate harmonisation. To use Harmony for CES-D vs AEBQ comparison, all you need to do is select these instruments from the Harmony’s database or upload your own versions in PDF format. You can do this easily via Harmony’s web interface at harmonydata.ac.uk/app. With Harmony, comparing CES-D vs AEBQ becomes an efficient and hassle-free process, leading to better research outcomes and deeper insights from both within and across various studies.
